Lucarelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quashing the claimant’s appeal where his brief failed to include a statement of questions involved
• quashing the appeal because substantial defects in the appellant’s brief impaired the court’s ability to conduct meaningful appellate review
• the claimant's appeal was quashed for failure to comply with the mandatory language of Rule 2116(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).