District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/22/2000
Lubin v. State
Citations
- 754 So. 2d 141
- 2000 WL 294758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the existence of undue prejudice stemming from testimony regarding a high crime area or other drug dealing activity “depends on the facts of each case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hulick v. BeersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-01· cited 5×
- LELIEVE v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-15· cited 5×
- Dunlap v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-28· cited 4×
- Veltre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-02· cited 4×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-06· cited 2×
- Retailic v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-02· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Breedlove v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 148×
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-11-27· cited 139×
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-15· cited 122×
- Salvatore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-09-07· cited 90×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-10· cited 82×
- Buenoano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-06-23· cited 67×
- Sireci v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-09-19· cited 49×
- Gillion v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-10· cited 41×
- Wheeler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-02· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.