Lubin v. Agora, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that commercial speech is “speech that does no more than propose a commercial transaction” (quoting Posadas de P.R. Assocs. v. Tourism Co. of P.R., 478 U.S. 328, 340, 106 S.Ct. 2968, 2976, 92 L.Ed.2d 266, 279 (1986))
• explaining that commercial speech is \speech that does no more than propose a commercial transaction\ (quoting Posadas de P.R. Assocs. v. Tourism Co. of P.R., 478 U.S. 328, 340, 106 S.Ct. 2968, 2976, 92 L.Ed.2d 266, 279 (1986))
• reserving for another day the question of “whether investor reliance must be 7 proven in order to establish securities fraud under § 11-301”
• declining to consider “an important issue” of law that was “not briefed or argued”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).