Skip to main content
· 8/22/2023

Luberski v. Luberski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that aliens who are paroled into the United States are not entitled to deportation proceedings, only exclusion proceedings
  • holding that an alien’s parole into the United States “did not alter her status as an ex- cluded alien”
  • holding that such parole does not entitle entering alien to deportation proceedings
  • holding that it is “particularly doubtful that Congress intended section 1225(b)(2)(A
  • noting that “the detention of an alien in custody pending determination of his admissibility does not legally constitute an entry though the alien is physically within the United States”
  • noting that an alien “paroled” into the United States pending admissibility had not effected an “entry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.