L.R. v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in turn quoting Dudley v. Eli Lilly & Co., 778 F.3d 909, 913 (11th Cir. 2014)
• “When the plaintiff contests or the court questions the defendant’s allegation [of the amount in controversy], the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy is sufficient.”
• “When the plaintiff contests or the court questions the defendant’s allegation [of the amount in controversy], the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy is sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).