LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of America, NA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “trial court's ruling [on a motion for Rule 1.540 relief] should not be disturbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion”
• applying gross abuse of discretion standard in reviewing trial court’s ruling on a motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540 and quoting Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117, 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978
• applying gross abuse of discretion standard in reviewing trial court's ruling on a motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540 and quoting Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So. 2d 117, 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978
• “Whether relief should be granted pursuant to Rule 1.540 is a fact specific question and the trial court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).