L.P. Commercial Corp. v. Caudill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[o]nly the person or entity to whom a subpoena is directed can seek to quash or modify that subpoena under Rule 45[d].”
• noting a motion to quash “may only be made by the party to whom the subpoena is directed except where the party seeking to challenge the subpoena has a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter requested in the subpoena”
• noting a motion to quash “may only be made by the party to whom the subpoena is directed except where the party seeking to challenge the subpoena has a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter requested in the subpoena”
• noting a motion to quash “may only be made by the party to whom the subpoena is directed except where the party seeking to challenge the subpoena has a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter requested in the subpoena”
• noting a motion to quash “may only be made by the party to whom the subpoena is directed except where the party seeking to challenge the subpoena has a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter requested in the subpoena”
• “Whether to allow a tape recorder or a third person at the examination of plaintiff raises only a single issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).