· 12/18/2006
Lozada v. City and County of San Francisco
Citations
- 52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 209
- 145 Cal. App. 4th 1139
- 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1080
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 16397
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11562
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We are not persuaded that substantial civil 21 penalties and actual damages do not constitute ‘money or damages’ within the meaning of the 22 Government Claims Act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.