Skip to main content
· 12/4/1973

Loyal Erectors, Inc. v. Hamilton & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 312 A.2d 748
  • 1973 Me. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • equitable recovery may be allowed if plaintiff provided services \in an honest endeavor\ to perform the contract even though plaintiff did not complete performance
  • “The disclosure is the statutory answer which presents the issues of fact upon which the liability of the trustee depends in reference to the business relations with the principal defendant.”
  • “[A]s a condition precedent to his right to recover [for unjust enrichment], the contractor must make out a prima facie case that the fair market value of his defective product shows that the result of his labor was of some value to the other party.”
  • payment of contract dependent on architect's approval of work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dufresne, Weatherbee, Pomeroy, Wer-Nick, Archibald, Webber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.