Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the 30-day presumption “emphasizes reliance upon actual wages [the employee] has already earned to create the wage base that most accurately reflects his true average monthly wage” and involves “no extrapolation or speculation about unearned wages”
• reliance on “actual wages [claimant] has already earned” avoids “speculation about his future earning potential”
• average monthly wage is based on all wages earned in thirty days prior to injury
• “[T]he wage base should realistically reflect a claimant’s actual monthly earning capacity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).