Skip to main content
· 9/18/1972

Lowndes Products Inc. v. Brower

Citations

  • 191 S.E.2d 761
  • 259 S.C. 322
  • 177 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 209
  • 1972 S.C. LEXIS 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a]n employee has a duty of fidelity to his employer apart from the question whether he has an obligation to maintain the employer’s processes and systems of operation in confidence.”
  • characterizing “isolated steps . . . taken to implement secrecy” as insufficient to merit trade secret protection
  • characterizing “isolated steps ... taken to implement secrecy” as insufficient to merit trade secret protection
  • plant manager who, while still employed by plaintiff, secretly hired key employees away, disrupting plaintiff’s operations, violated duty of loyalty
  • duty breached when employees conspired to take trade secrets and hire away other workers for the benefit of rival company they were forming
  • duty breached when employees conspired to take trade secrets and hire away other workers for the benefit of rival company they were forming

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bussey, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.