· 9/18/1972
Lowndes Products Inc. v. Brower
Citations
- 191 S.E.2d 761
- 259 S.C. 322
- 177 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 209
- 1972 S.C. LEXIS 247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[a]n employee has a duty of fidelity to his employer apart from the question whether he has an obligation to maintain the employer’s processes and systems of operation in confidence.”
- characterizing “isolated steps . . . taken to implement secrecy” as insufficient to merit trade secret protection
- characterizing “isolated steps ... taken to implement secrecy” as insufficient to merit trade secret protection
- plant manager who, while still employed by plaintiff, secretly hired key employees away, disrupting plaintiff’s operations, violated duty of loyalty
- duty breached when employees conspired to take trade secrets and hire away other workers for the benefit of rival company they were forming
- duty breached when employees conspired to take trade secrets and hire away other workers for the benefit of rival company they were forming
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bussey, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.