Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. Olin Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it is not an abuse of discretion for a district judge to deny a motion for leave to amend a complaint, when the motion is designed to avoid an impending adverse summary judgment
• agreeing with “the district court’s conclusion that, in order to ensure the orderly administration of justice, [the district court had] the authority and responsibility to set and enforce reasonable deadlines”
• affirming denial of motion to amend where plaintiff did not file its motion for leave to amend its first amended complaint until over two months after plaintiff was on notice of the apparent need to amend
• “[T]o ensure the orderly administration of justice, [a district court] has the authority and responsibility to set and enforce reasonable deadlines.”
• “[I]t is not an abuse of discretion for a district court to deny a motion for leave to amend following the close of discovery, past the deadline for amendments and past the deadline for filing dispositive motions.”
• “[I]t is not an abuse of discretion for a district court to deny a motion for leave to amend following the close of discovery, past the deadline for amendments, and past the deadline for filing dispositive motions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).