Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent specific detail about the present action, the supplement in no way clarifies the aggregate value of the claims here.”
• “Defendants’ hopeful conjecture based on Alabama jury verdicts in cases that may have some similarity to this case, but are not closely similar, do[es] not suffice ....”
• “There is nothing in the original complaint to distinguish between a plaintiff who may be claiming severe lung disease from one who may be claiming grit in her grits.”
• “Defendants’ hopeful conjecture based on Alabama jury verdicts in cases that may have some similarity to this case, but are not closely similar, do[es] not suffice . . . .”
• “Absent specific detail about the present action, the supplement in no way clarifies the aggregate value of the claims here.”
• “Absent specific detail about the present action, the supplement in no way clarifies the aggregate value of the claims here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).