Lowery v. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we can determine the timeliness of a filing from the face of the documents and the records of the court
• “[W]e have long refused to give overly technical, restrictive readings to procedural rules, particularly when remedial statutes such as the Unemployment Compensation [Law] are involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).