Skip to main content
· 10/26/2011

Lowenstein v. CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST

Citations

  • 820 F. Supp. 2d 639
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124167
  • 2011 WL 5069396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the employer's repeated warnings for the employee's six absences during a nine-month period, coupled with other discipline and rejection of the employee's notes from her doctor, considered together, stated severe or pervasive conduct to state a hostile work environment claim
  • “Since SMMC can be held liable for its employees’ discriminatory conduct, SMMC and [its employees] shared a common interest in defending against plaintiff’s allegations.”
  • “The Court may consider the EEOC charge at the motion-to-dismiss stage because it is ‘an undisputedly authentic document’ on which ‘plaintiff’s claims are based.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DuBOIS

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.