· 4/13/1981
Lowell v. Glidden-Durkee, Div. of SCM Corp.
Citations
- 529 F. Supp. 17
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14172
- 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,612
- 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a protected activity “includes opposing any act or practice by the 24 employer that violates the ADA and pursuing rights guaranteed by the statute like requesting a 1 reasonable accommodation”
- rule (2) more defensible than rule (3)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Getzendanner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.