Skip to main content
· 4/13/1981

Lowell v. Glidden-Durkee, Div. of SCM Corp.

Citations

  • 529 F. Supp. 17
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14172
  • 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,612
  • 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a protected activity “includes opposing any act or practice by the 24 employer that violates the ADA and pursuing rights guaranteed by the statute like requesting a 1 reasonable accommodation”
  • rule (2) more defensible than rule (3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Getzendanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.