Skip to main content
· 2/2/1989

Lowe v. Rockford Newspaper, Inc.

Citations

  • 534 N.E.2d 549
  • 179 Ill. App. 3d 592
  • 128 Ill. Dec. 367
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • privilege did not apply where statements implying that plaintiff stole a car did not appear in the police report defendant relied on
  • privilege did not apply where statements implying that plaintiff stole a car did not appear in the police report defendant relied on
  • implication that auto repossessor is really just a car thief
  • implication that auto repossessor is really just a car thief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.