Lowe v. Dalrymple
Citations
- 117 Pa. 564
- 12 A. 567
- 1888 Pa. LEXIS 444
Syllabus
<p>1. Where testimony has been given tending to establish a combination to defraud, the declarations of either party made before the design has been fully consummated, though not in the presence of the other, are proper evidence as affecting both.</p> <p>.2. It is not necessary that the evidence of collusion be conclusive, or that the collusion appear by positive proof; it may be shown by such facts and circumstances as will warrant a presumption of its existence.</p>
Judges: Claek, Clark, Gordon, Green, Mercer, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.