Skip to main content
· 1/3/1888

Lowe v. Dalrymple

Citations

  • 117 Pa. 564
  • 12 A. 567
  • 1888 Pa. LEXIS 444

Syllabus

<p>1. Where testimony has been given tending to establish a combination to defraud, the declarations of either party made before the design has been fully consummated, though not in the presence of the other, are proper evidence as affecting both.</p> <p>.2. It is not necessary that the evidence of collusion be conclusive, or that the collusion appear by positive proof; it may be shown by such facts and circumstances as will warrant a presumption of its existence.</p>

Judges: Claek, Clark, Gordon, Green, Mercer, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.