Lowe v. Cox Paving, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court mistakenly found there could be a conviction for \malicious cutting\ under an indictment for the lesser offense of \unlawful cutting\
• concluding that the trial court 4 It is well settled that the question of a variance between an indictment and the proof offered at trial is subject to the contemporaneous objection rule. See, e.g., Booth v. Commonwealth, 165 Va. 794, 795-96, 183 S.E. 257, 257-58 (1936
• reversing malicious wounding conviction and remanding for a new trial when appellant was indicted for unlawful wounding
• reversing malicious wounding conviction and remanding for a new trial when appellant was indicted for unlawful wounding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).