Lowe v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that where, as here, an EAJA petitioner presents uncontested proof of an increase in the cost of living sufficient to justify hourly attorney’s fees of more than that [the statutory maximum], enhanced fees should be awarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).