Skip to main content
· 9/3/1992

Lowder v. Lowder

Citations

  • 332 N.C. 346
  • 421 S.E.2d 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that an invention provides results which would not have been expected by those skilled in the art is strong evidence in rebuttal of an assertion that the invention would have been obvious.”
  • “The fact that an invention provides results which would not have been expected by those skilled in the art is strong evi- dence in rebuttal of an assertion that the invention would have been obvious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.