Skip to main content
· 11/26/2003

Lovings v. Cleary

Citations

  • 799 N.E.2d 76
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 2200
  • 2003 WL 22805184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no evidence that driver was confronted with a sudden event outside driver’s contemplation, so the giving of sudden emergency instruction was not relevant to the issue of negligence before the jury
  • “An instruction on sudden emergency is appropriate only when there is evidence” of the three prerequisites.
  • evidence indicated that dangerous road conditions were apparent to defendant who was driving on curvy, hilly roads as snow and freezing rain fell

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Kirsch, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.