Skip to main content
· 12/5/2000

Loving & Associates, Inc. v. Carothers

Citations

  • 619 N.W.2d 782
  • 2000 Minn. App. LEXIS 1217
  • 2000 WL 1779408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[b]ecause a guaranty is a contract, its terms must be understood in their plain and ordinary sense in light of the parties’ intentions and the circumstances under which the guaranty was given”
  • stating that a factor in determining whether the guarantor should be released from liability is whether there has been a material increase in the risk assumed by the guarantor at the time he signed the guaranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klaphake, Lansing, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.