Lovill v. Hatfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the court should ordinarily refrain from exercising jurisdiction in the 11 absence of extraordinary circumstances” when all federal claims have been dismissed
• explaining that “the court should ordinarily refrain from exercising jurisdiction in the absence of extraordinary circumstances” when all federal claims have been dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) (internal citations omitted)
• “It is undisputed that defamation, standing alone and apart from any other governmental action, is insufficient to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).