Lovette v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court committed reversible error in instructing the jury on a principals theory because there was no evidence that the appellant acted in concert with anyone in committing the charged offenses
• “The trial court committed reversible error in instructing the jury on the principal theory because there was no evidence that Mr. Lovette acted in concert with anyone in committing the theft or the burglary.”
• “The trial court committed reversible error in instructing the jury on the principal theory because there was no evidence that Mr. Lovette acted in concert with anyone in committing the theft or the burglary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-14· cited 28×
• Masaka v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-01· cited 27×
• McGriff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-30· cited 9×
• Shavers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-02· cited 7×
• & SC15-297 Donald Lenneth Banks v. State of Florida and Donald Lenneth Banks v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-04-20· cited 5×
• Bibbs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. Fluellen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 121×
• Negron v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-11-13· cited 117×
• Hair v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-29· cited 17×
• Ramirez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-10· cited 3×