Skip to main content

Lovett v. State

Citations

  • 491 So. 2d 1034
  • 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the standard for the admissibility of statements of homicide victims under the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule
  • for a statement made at the scene of the crime to be admissible under excited utterance, it must relate to a “startling event,” “be instinctive and spontaneous, and not be deliberate or retrospective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.