Lovett v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only a trial court's abuse of its discretion would justify disturbing its ruling to grant or deny a motion for continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gray v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-10-31· cited 69×
• Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. v. Saul Subsidiary I Ltd. Partnership
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2004-07-30· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Centers v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1990-08-10· cited 44×
• Quarles v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1970-06-26· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Gadd
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1984-03-08· cited 28×
• Corbett v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1986-09-05· cited 17×
• Poorman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1989-10-19· cited 10×
• Stump v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1987-11-20· cited 6×
• Toppass v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1990-09-28· cited 4×
• White v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1958-02-14· cited 2×