Lovell v. United States Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiff incorrectly concludes that because a reviewing officer cited one fact in support of the officer’s conclusion, which was contrary to a field officer’s recommendation, he or she ‘disregarded’ all other facts. Instead, the reviewing officer viewed the facts through a different lens.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).