Skip to main content

Lovell v. State

Citations

  • 375 S.E.2d 658
  • 189 Ga. App. 311
  • 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 1383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence of the fair market value of damage to an item, for the purposes of determining restitution, was insufficient when it was based on \approximation rather than by a proper opinion of the value of the items damaged\
  • noting that evidence of the fair market value of damage to an item, for the purposes of determining restitution, was insufficient when it was based on “approximation rather than by a proper opinion of the value of the items damaged”
  • a trial court may not set the amount of restitution “by approximation rather than by a proper opinion of the value of the [property] damaged”
  • evidence insufficient when amount of restitution determined by approximation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, Deen, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.