Skip to main content
· 3/9/1896

Lovell v. House of the Good Shepherd

Citations

  • 14 Wash. 211
  • 44 P. 253
  • 1896 Wash. LEXIS 340

Syllabus

<p>HABEAS CORPUS — CUSTODY OF CHILD — DAMAGES—RECOVERY OF EXPENSE OF ACTION.</p> <p>The assumption of custody of a minor child, under order of the superior court in a habeas corpus proceeding, will not constitute false imprisonment, although the appellate court on a review of the habeas corpus proceedings may reverse the judgment of the superior court as erroneous.</p> <p>. A party who successfully brings an action for the custody of a child in habeas corpus proceedings, cannot subsequently bring another action to recover the expenses incident to the first case.</p>

Judges: Anders, Dunbar, Gordon, Hoyt, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.