Skip to main content
· 9/27/1991

Lovelace v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Citations

  • 775 F. Supp. 228
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14983
  • 1991 WL 211265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employee of a city public school district participating in a health insurance plan established by collective bargaining with public and private Ohio educational institutions are exempt from ERISA
  • “A plan established by a government employer through collective bargaining meets the ERISA ‘governmental plan’ requirements”
  • same for plan covering city public school system employees, even though plan was issued and administered by private insurer
  • “Prudential’s administration of the policy does not negate the “governmental plan” character of the [public school system’s] plan”
  • “ERISA-regulates employee benefit plans, such.as the plan at issue .... [but] exempt[s] any plan established or maintained ‘by the government of any State or political subdivision thereof for its employees.” (emphasis added)
  • plan established by government employer through collective bargaining meets governmental plan exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carl B. Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.