Skip to main content
· 6/8/1998

Lovelace v. Higgins (In Re Higgins)

Citations

  • 220 B.R. 1022
  • 15 Colo. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 320
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 680
  • 1998 WL 296857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing motion for extension of time did not toll period for appealing nor did motion to extend automatically extend appeal time until court ruled on extension motion
  • “An order denying a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is a ‘final order,’ from which an appeal will lie.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pusateri, Robinson, Matheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.