Skip to main content

Love v. Love

Citations

  • 959 P.2d 523
  • 114 Nev. 572
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the lack of a genetic relationship does not preclude a finding of paternity, as NRS 126.051 \clearly reflects the legislature's intent to allow nonbiological factors to become critical in a paternity determination\
  • concluding that the lack of a genetic relationship does not preclude a finding of paternity, as NRS 126.051 \clearly reflects the legislature's intent to allow nonbiological factors to become critical in a paternity determination\
  • concluding that the district court's grant of attorney fees 13 We note that the district court awarded Atlantis the cost of repair as compensation in its breach of contract claim. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 20 (0
  • providing that the Nevada Parentage Act \clearly reflects the legislature's intent to allow nonbiological factors to become critical in a paternity determination\
  • providing that the Nevada Parentage Act \clearly reflects the legislature's intent to allow nonbiological factors to become critical in a paternity determination\
  • articulating the extrinsic fraud exception to claim preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Springer, Rose, Young, Maupin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.