Love v. Klosky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “all requests for reinstatement of appellate rights, including PCRA appellate rights, must meet the timeliness requirements or an exception thereto under the PCRA”
• noting that victim’s delay in reporting the sexual assault must “be weighed by the trial court in determining the victim’s credibility”
• explaining that “the use of a written jury trial waiver form [is] sufficient in the absence of an oral jury trial waiver colloquy”
• stating that a sexual assault victim’s delay in reporting, and the victim’s return to the appellant’s home following the assault, were facts to be weighed by the finder of fact
• finding no error in PCRA court’s granting relief on a claim that clerk of court’s -8- J-S03022-23 failure to serve a PCRA dismissal order on defendant and his attorney was governmental interference
• a claim challenging the reliability of testimony implicates the weight of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).