· 10/20/1924
Love v. Griffith
Citations
- 266 U.S. 32
- 45 S. Ct. 12
- 69 L. Ed. 157
- 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding challenge to rule prohibiting African Americans from voting in past primary election moot because “bill was for an injunction that could not be granted at that time” and “[t]here was no constitutional obligation to extend the remedy beyond what was prayed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.