Skip to main content
· 10/20/1924

Love v. Griffith

Citations

  • 266 U.S. 32
  • 45 S. Ct. 12
  • 69 L. Ed. 157
  • 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding challenge to rule prohibiting African Americans from voting in past primary election moot because “bill was for an injunction that could not be granted at that time” and “[t]here was no constitutional obligation to extend the remedy beyond what was prayed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.