Love v. Deere and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no substantial change found from user’s efforts to reattach shield that fell off combine because of fatigue failure resulting from design defect
• no substantial change found from user's efforts to reattach shield that fell off combine because of fatigue failure resulting from design defect
• evidence of repair as well as evidence of original product defect all presented to jury; “issue of proximate cause and intervening efficient cause [wal]s for the jury to decide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).