Love v. Busch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to compel discovery into Yale’s conduct under contracts with similarly situated individuals
• “In order to be ‘relevant’ for Civil Rule 26 discovery purposes, information and evidentiary material must be ‘relevant’ as defined in Rule of Evidence 401.” (citation omitted)
• citation and 5 “‘Letters of request’ are synonymous with ‘letters rogatory.’” Pearlstein, 332 F.R.D. at 120 n.1. 6 The parties do not dispute that the procedures set forth in the Hague Convention apply to the evidence sought by Parimal. quotation marks omitted
• discovery- seeking party bears the burden of demonstrating relevance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).