Love and Amos Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• diseussing cases which observed “it is not necessary that the consideration of the promise be stated in writing in order to maintain an action under the Statute of Frauds.”
• discussing cases which observed “it is not necessary that the consideration of the promise be stated in writing in order to maintain an action under the Statute of Frauds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).