Loureiro v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that substantive rules may also alter the permissible punishment for certain categories of defendants
• observing that substantive rules may also alter the permissible punishment for certain categories of defendants
• observing that substantive rules may also alter the permissible punishment for certain categories of defendants
• holding equitable tolling applied where inmate who experienced numerous transfers and serious medical conditions \missed the one-year deadline by less than three months.\
• holding Begay “is a new substantive rule” under the Teague analysis and applying it to calculate the limitations period under § 2255(f)(3) for an initial § 2255 motion (emphasis added)
• explaining that, although Begay’s new rule did not alter the underlying elements of the crime, the new rule nonetheless “involved the substantive construction of a criminal statute” that determined the maximum lawful punishment certain classes of defendants may receive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).