Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the workplace environment is likely to become more readily permeated by race-based ridicule, insult, and the like, insofar as the repeated harassing acts approach the level of severe”
• stating that a retaliation claim requires a materially adverse action, which is one that would dissuade a plaintiff from making a charge of discrimination
• explaining that the “plaintiff must show more than a few isolated incidents of [gender-based] enmity.”
• holding issue waived on appeal where party did not make any meaningful appellate argument
• explaining that “there is a qualitative dimension to the” severity and pervasiveness inquires
• recognizing “that ‘the severity and 9 pervasiveness evaluation is particularly unsuited for summary judgment’ because it is inherently fact-found by nature” (quoting O’Shea v. Yellow Tech. Servs., Inc., 185 F.3d 1093, 1098 (10th Cir. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).