Louisville Tank Line Co. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment eliminating an accord and satisfaction defense because \only the Attorney General is authorized to settle FCA claims\
• granting summary judgment eliminating an accord and satisfaction defense because “only the Attorney General is authorized to settle FCA claims”
• “Generalized complaints about wrongdoing are not sufficient to serve as predicate acts for FCA retaliations^ cjomplaints about wrongdoing are not actionable unless they concern fraud or false claims against the Government.”
• “The defendants move to dismiss all of the 15 § 924(c) counts, arguing that Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery do 16 not qualify as crimes of violence under the force clause of § 924(c), and that § 924(c
• “The defendants move to dismiss all of the 15 § 924(c) counts, arguing that Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery do 16 not qualify as crimes of violence under the force clause of § 924(c), and that § 924(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).