Louisville Ry. Co. v. Hutchcraft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where a state-law claim is based entirely 16 on a mooted ADA claim, it follows that the state-law claim is mooted as well.”
• “Where a state-law claim is based entirely on a mooted ADA claim, it follows that the 3 15 state-law claim is mooted as well.”
• “Where 10 a state-law claim is based entirely on a mooted ADA claim, it follows that the state-law claim is 11 mooted as well.”
• “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 26(e) places litigants under an affirmative duty to supplement non-deposition discovery responses, 7 even after the discovery cut-off date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).