Louisville Ry. Co. v. Gaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff’s Sherman Act claims were barred by Rooker-Feldman and stating, “Plaintiff’s ‘manufactured effort’ to re-characterize the source of his injuries is insufficient to circumvent the Rooker–Feldman bar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).