Louisville Railway Co. v. Philippina Steubing's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a breach of contract claim as “entirely duplicative” of a claim for anticipatory breach
• dismissing a breach of contract claim as “entirely duplicative” of a claim for anticipatory breach
• declining to convert Rule 12(c) motion into a Rule 56 motion due to the lack of discovery
• declining to consider documents where the complaint “neither references [them] nor relies on their terms and effect at all, let alone ‘heavily’”
• proper measure of damages for breach of contract involving income-producing asset is “market value” of that asset

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).