Louisville Railway Co. v. Dugan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[w]hile some of the alleged statements, viewed in isolation, may be mere puffery, nonetheless, when (as here alleged
• dismissing claims asserted under Brazilian law based on a finding that they were subject to mandatory arbitration
• “[P]laintiffs’ allegation that they purchased the notes pursuant to or traceable to the materially false and misleading registration statements suffices, at this stage, to establish their standing under Section 11.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).