Skip to main content
· 12/18/1914

Louisville Railway Co. v. Dott

Citations

  • 161 Ky. 759
  • 171 S.W. 438
  • 1914 Ky. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Plaintiffs have failed to plead that they saw, heard, or relied on such [specific] misrepresentations, Plaintiffs’ partial-representation theory fails.”
  • “A partial- 23 representation claim requires Plaintiffs to plead reliance on at least some misleading partial 24 representations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.