238 U.S. 1· 6/1/1915

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States

Syllabus

<p>The general rule is that the Appellate Court will not interfere with the decision of the Chancellor refusing an interlocutory injunction unless abuse of discretion clearly appears; where, however, the order sought to be enjoined operates to reduce revenue the Chancellor’s discretion should be influenced by the fact that the decree, though interlocutory, may be the equivalent of a final decree.</p> <p>The fact that irreparable injury might result from orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, unless interlocutory injunctions might be granted restraining their enforcement, undoubtedly influenced Congress to enact the provision in the Act of October 22, 1913, for a direct appeal to this court from an order granting or denying, after ■ notice and hearing, an interlocutory injunction.</p> <p>Where appellants are able to concede that there was evidence which, although conflicting, tended to support the findings of the Commission, the practice of omitting the testimony and simply insisting in this court that the findings are insufficient to support the orders is commendable, not only as a saving of expense of printing the record but also of eliminating such testimony,’ as is necessarily immaterial in an appellate court which cannot reverse findings if supported by any substantial evidence, even though the evidence be conflicting.</p> <p>The new Equity Rules (75,76, 77) call for a winnowing out of the use¿ less; the presentation of only relevant evidence and exhibits; the elimination of reduplications of oral and written evidence and condensation into narrative form of what is material to the issue before the court.</p> <p>Where an existing freight rate is attacked, the burden is on complainant to show that it is unreasonable in fact; this rule especially applies when the rate has been in force for a long period, during which the traffic has greatly increased in volume.</p> <p>Market price of property and work is affected by so many and varving factors that it is imp

Judges: Lamar, Pitney, McReynolds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.