Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Spicer's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he use of an image on a product can support a claim for false endorsement.”
• “[T]he fair use doctrine necessarily raises questions of fact that cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss.
• complaint’s reference to registered trademark “is sufficient to allege plausibly the distinctiveness required by the dilution statute.”
• plaintiff must “identify interference with a specific business relationship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).