Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. O'Brien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering remand because mortgage foreclosure is a state law case, and defendant's assertion of issues under the FDCPA does not create federal jurisdiction
• treating the alleged violation of the rule of unanimity as waived for failure to object within 30 days
• “[B]ecause the face of Plaintiff’s [state law foreclosure] Complaint identifies no federal question, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, irrespective of Defendants’ reliance upon a federal defense and/or assertion of a federal counterclaim.”
• “[B]ecause the face of Plaintiff’s [state law foreclosure] Complaint identifies no federal question, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, irrespective of Defendants’ reliance upon a federal defense and/or assertion of a federal counterclaim.”
• “[B]ecause the face of Plaintiff’s [state law foreclosure] Complaint identifies no federal question, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, irrespective of Defendants’ reliance upon a federal defense and/or assertion of a federal counterclaim.”
• “Plaintiffs Complaint relies exclusively upon state law, and therefore provides no basis for federal question jurisdiction . .. Nor can Defendants create federal jurisdiction by asserting federal defenses and/or counterclaims to Plaintiff’s state law foreclosure Complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).