Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Messer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the economic loss doctrine does not prevent recovery for economic losses which are “more akin to the decreased value of the product than to loss of profits or time”
• finding the plaintiff had standing to sue based on contamination on their property traceable to the defendant
• finding the plaintiff had standing to sue based on contamination on their property traceable to the defendant
• [D]ischarges in their entirety are not ‘solid waste’ under RCRA if they are subject to the CWA [ ] permit scheme.”
• “A landowner may only recover damages for nuisance, however, for real, substantial, and material injury and not for trifling annoyances and unsubstantiated or unrealized fears.” (internal alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).